It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love. For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” If you bite and devour each other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other.
But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law. Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit. Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other.
Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. If anyone thinks they are something when they are not, they deceive themselves. Each one should test their own actions. Then they can take pride in themselves alone, without comparing themselves to someone else, for each one should carry their own load.
Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.
It’s cute that Google Maps can render the world on a sphere, but it hurts usability. Good job, Google.
This decision is a long time coming for me: I have decided to no longer renew my paid Mac developer membership, thereby removing my apps from Apple’s App Stores. My reasons are described below.
Apple’s management of their own platform and their (allegedly) curated app store are a train wreck.
The App Store, which Apple claims is curated, is still filled with scam apps, malware, and other nefarious bits of software.
App review is inconsistent. The guidelines for submitted apps are haphazardly–perhaps even capriciously–enforced. Apple’s own apps are not subject to those guidelines, and numerous other large developers have gotten away with apps that are in violation of those guidelines.
Apple has consistently and repeatedly ignored the request for upgrade pricing/functionality, leading to race-to-the-bottom pricing, and developer gymnastics to get to something resembling sustainable, recurring revenue. (Apple claimed in the beginning that users would get updates for free, in perpetuity, developers be damned. Of course they didn’t care about how other developers would make money on their store. The annual cycle of hardware updates would ensure that Apple was making money.) Granted, there’s a form of upgrade pricing through in-app purchase subscriptions, but it’s still a monumental hassle to get it working correctly.
Additionally, Apple has proven to be an incompetent and overbearing gatekeeper of their platform. A device purchased by the user is the user’s responsibility, and the user has a right to run whatever they choose (operating systems and applications alike) on said device, within legal parameters. Apple maintains a stranglehold on getting apps onto a device (in the name of battery life and user security). Third-party app stores, and apps distributed thereby, are prohibited. Apple’s justification is weak at best.
It’s admirable that Apple would look out for the interests of its users, but it lacks credibility when this oversight is inconsistent and–I daresay–hypocritical. Users are ultimately responsible for their own devices and the software they install on them. If Apple really wants to safeguard the platform, they need to do a better job of it, or get out of the way.
Lastly, but not necessarily reflective of the App Store, the quality of Apple’s software, both applications and operating systems, has taken a marked turn for the worse. Even the hardware is suffering (MacBook Pro keyboards?). And Apple’s not even humble enough to admit publicly when they’ve made a mistake.
I just can’t, in good conscience, hand over an annual membership fee and subject myself to these shenanigans. Apple has gotten too big for its britches. Should they gain some clarity and become better behaved, I may reconsider.
It probably shouldn’t, but 50 feels different than 49.
In a post on EN World commenting on the artwork for the cover of the second edition The One Ring rulebook, a commenter exclaims:
A female dwarf adventurer in Tolkien’s universe? No thank you. Too much against canon for me.
I really detest this kind of closed-minded grognardia. Anyone who bothers to study the canon of dwarves in Middle-Earth knows that, while they are rare, female dwarf adventurers are not a violation of canon.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.